The key development parameters of the recent past are not predominantly about
economic productivity, but have more to do with equity and access to information
and enhancing the knowledge base. Thus the most important assets of nations are
not raw materials, physical goods or economic production, but human resources
keyed into the information and knowledge revolution. (Schoolnet Research, 2002)
The Digital Review
of Asia Pacific reports on the state of deployment and innovation of ICT in
the region. It also attempts analytical syntheses of how the region deals with
issues and concerns that come to the fore as new technologies are deployed to
advance the socioeconomic development of Asia-Pacific information societies. Four
organisations collaborate in this initiative as co-publishers: the Pan Asia Networking
Programme (PAN) of the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), the Asia-Pacific
Development Information Programme (APDIP) of the United Nations Development Programme
(UNDP), and the Network of UNESCO Chairs in Communications (Orbicom) in close
collaboration with Southbound.
This publication is the second volume in the series. It incorporates data from
the Digital Divide Index, an initiative of Orbicom directed by George Sciadas.¹
While the 2003/2004 edition focused on initiatives to transform the digital divide
into digital opportunities in 27 economies and a subregion, the 2005/2006 edition
focuses on the use of ICT for development and in building information societies.
A panel of distinguished
authors from 29 economies in the region convened at the ASEAN Foundation in Jakarta,
Indonesia under the kind auspices of the ASEAN Secretary-General, H.E. Ong Keng
Yong, and the leadership of the chief editor, Chin Saik Yoon, to prepare the present
edition. The 2005/2006
edition provides updates on the 27 individual economies covered in the last edition
and extends coverage to two additional economies: Iran and the Maldives. An entirely
new thematic section is included which introduces a series of discussions on (1)
bridging the digital divide, (2) Internet governance , (3) the social, political
and cultural aspects of ICT, and (4) appropriate ICT. This edition also provides
regional overviews of the Pacific island states, the Association of Southeast
Asian Nations (ASEAN) and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). In their
research and debate on how ICT for development contributes to the building of
information societies in the region, the authors invite all of us, from the government,
industry and civil society, to face a major challenge in terms of converging divergent
interests :
The economies of the region are approaching the Tunis phase of WSIS in 2005 with
different economic interests that threaten to fragment, rather than unite, the
region. A deep chasm now separates the advanced ICT powerhouses on one side of
the digital divide from the countries that are painstakingly rebuilding their
infrastructure from scratch on the other side. (p. 12)
While other regions of the world, such as Europe and the Americas, shift progressively
towards regional integration, the Asia-Pacific region faces the threat of fragmentation.
This challenge is so important that it will continue to be present in the dynamics
of development well beyond the Tunis phase of the World Summit on the Information
Society (WSIS). Fragmentation may constitute a very important risk in the current
globalisation process, which helps to "flatten" the world. The globalisation process
involves workflow software adoption, open-sourcing, outsourcing, offshoring, supply-chaining,
insourcing and other components elucidated by Thomas L. Friedman (2005) in his
latest book, The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century.
While some talk about the knowledge society or the information economy,²
others, like Friedman, argue using the metaphor of the "Flat World". They posit
that, while some rituals and debates are taking place at WSIS and elsewhere, globalisation
forces continue to grow (bringing with them successes as well as discontent) and
that some economies may face a new type of dependency within our networked society
which may be manifested in very different ways from those anticipated by Kenichi
Ohmae (1995). If
appropriation of information and ICT were to be the building blocks of an information
economy and of a knowledge society, our authors warn us of another major and urgent
challenge confronting all of us:
The chief obstacle to the development of the information society is turning out
to be the stifling copyright restrictions and intellectual property mechanisms
asserted by economies with well-developed ICT industries. This stranglehold on
knowledge has overtaken the lack of access to technologies as the main cause of
the digital divide. (p. 5)
And beyond the challenge of removing this type of stranglehold on knowledge, another
issue remains regarding the urgency of including and involving all sectors of
society in ICT policy dialogues:
In Asia Pacific, where governments and inter-governmental organisations tend to
dominate the policy-making arena, we should ensure that ICT policy dialogues include
all sectors. In particular, the role of civil society, which is often the missing
player in these discussions, needs to be strengthened. The Geneva summit recommended
that institutional arrangements for the governance of the Internet and the drafting
of ICT policy should be multilateral, transparent, democratic, and open to all
stakeholders. These principles for good Internet governance should be embraced
in our region. (p. 28)
Should this principle of inclusion be progressively implemented in terms of an
enabling environment in a region that aims to move progressively towards coherence
rather than fragmentation? And should we also recognise that "the most important
assets of nations are not raw materials, physical goods or economic production,
but human resources keyed into the information and knowledge revolution"?
Our acceptance of both would lead us to shape a participatory paradigm of communication
for development that goes beyond the modernisation and dependency paradigms. The
corresponding emphasis on the role of human capital in building the knowledge
economy, and its central function of nurturing information societies, in turn
assigns to ICT significant promise that these new technologies may help us achieve
the Millennium Development Goals, which include all of the above challenges. These
are only a few of the many challenges that are discussed by our panel of authors
in the thematic chapters. We are most grateful to the panel of authors from 29
economies in the region for their case studies, and for their joint research and
debate around the themes for this edition, and to the chief editor, for presenting
the results of this research and debate. We certainly hope that readers of the
Digital Review of Asia Pacific 2005/2006 will find this volume a useful
guide for future research that contributes insights to help all of us to bravely
encounter the Flat World.
Claude-Yves Charron
ORBICOM
Maria Ng Lee Hoon PAN-IDRC
Shahid
Akhtar UNDP-APDIP
Notes -
The Digital Divide Index diagrams have been completely revised by George Sciadas
for publication in this volume. Further information about the index, which covers
all regions of the world, is available in the following publications:
Sciadas,
G. (Ed.) (2005). From the Digital Divide to Digital Opportunities: Measuring
Infostates for Development. Montreal/Ottawa: Orbicom/National Research Council
of Canada.
Sciadas, G. (Ed.) (2003). Monitoring the Digital Divide .
. . and Beyond. Montreal/Ottawa: Orbicom/National Research Council of Canada.
- Manuel
Castells (1998) defines the information economy in these terms (p. 66):
"A
new economy has emerged in the last two decades on a worldwide scale. I call it
informational and global to identify its fundamental distinctive features and
to emphasize their intertwining. It is informational because the productivity
and competitiveness of units or agents in this economy (be it firms, regions,
or nations) fundamentally depend upon their capacity to generate, process, and
apply efficiently knowledge-based information. It is global because the core activities
of production, consumption, and circulation, as well as their components (capital,
labour, raw materials, management, information, technology, markets), are organized
on a global scale, either directly or through a network of linkages between economic
agents. It is informational and global because, under the new historical conditions,
productivity is generated through and competition is played out in a global network
of interaction. And it has emerged in the last quarter of the twentieth century
because the Information Technology Revolution provides the indispensable, material
basis for such a new economy."
References
Castells, M. (1998). The Information Age I: The Rise of the Network Society.
Oxford: Blackwell.
Friedman, T.L. (2005). The World Is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First
Century. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Ohmae, K. (1995). The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies.
New York: Free Press.
Schoolnet Research (2002). Enhancing Human Capital Index: New Approaches for the
Knowledge Economy. Education background paper presented at the GIIC Conference,
New Delhi, 14 - 15 March, by Schoolnet India Limited, Mumbai. Available at http://www.giic.org/events/indiaconferenceConferenceBackgroundPaper.pdf. |